From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Faraone

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Mar 8, 2024
No. 369180 (Mich. Ct. App. Mar. 8, 2024)

Opinion

369180

03-08-2024

IN RE ATTORNEY FEES OF MICHAEL A FARAONE


LC No. 21-003238-FC

Brock A. Swartzle Presiding Judge Jane E. Markey Michael F. Gadola, C.J. Judges

ORDER

The motion to remand is DENIED for failure to persuade the Court of the necessity of a remand at this time. Denial of remand is without prejudice to a case call panel of this Court determining that remand is necessary once the case is submitted on a session calendar.

The motion for peremptory reversal pursuant to MCR 7.211(C)(4) is DENIED for failure to persuade the Court of the existence of manifest error requiring reversal and warranting peremptory relief without argument or formal submission.


Summaries of

In re Faraone

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Mar 8, 2024
No. 369180 (Mich. Ct. App. Mar. 8, 2024)
Case details for

In re Faraone

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ATTORNEY FEES OF MICHAEL A FARAONE

Court:Court of Appeals of Michigan

Date published: Mar 8, 2024

Citations

No. 369180 (Mich. Ct. App. Mar. 8, 2024)