From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Failure to Satisfy Costs, 94S00-0801-MS-9 (Ind. 3-28-2008)

Supreme Court of Indiana
Mar 28, 2008
No. 94S00-0801-MS-9 (Ind. Mar. 28, 2008)

Opinion

No. 94S00-0801-MS-9.

March 28, 2008.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH RESPECT TO DANIEL S. KELLY

On January 8, 2008, the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission filed a "Petition for Suspension of Certain Attorneys for Failure to Satisfy Costs Ordered in Connection with Lawyer Discipline Proceedings," asserting each of the Respondents failed to pay costs assessed in a disciplinary action by the due date of the attorney's annual registration fee (October 1), in violation of the requirements of Indiana Admission and Discipline Rules 23(10)(f)(5), 23(16), and (2)(b).

On March 18, 2008, this Court entered an order suspending from the practice of law in Indiana three attorneys, including Daniel S. Kelly. The Commission now files a "Motion to Dismiss," reporting that Daniel S. Kelly has paid in full the amount owed in unpaid costs.

Being duly advised, the Court GRANTS the motion, DISMISSES this action with respect to Daniel S. Kelly, and REINSTATES Daniel S. Kelly to the practice of law in Indiana.

The Court directs the Clerk to forward a copy of this Order to Daniel S. Kelly or his attorney, to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, and to all other entities entitled to notice under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(3)(d).

Done at Indianapolis, Indiana, this 28 th day ofMarch, 2008.


Summaries of

In re Failure to Satisfy Costs, 94S00-0801-MS-9 (Ind. 3-28-2008)

Supreme Court of Indiana
Mar 28, 2008
No. 94S00-0801-MS-9 (Ind. Mar. 28, 2008)
Case details for

In re Failure to Satisfy Costs, 94S00-0801-MS-9 (Ind. 3-28-2008)

Case Details

Full title:In re Failure to Satisfy Costs in Lawyer Disciplinary Cases of: Daniel S…

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: Mar 28, 2008

Citations

No. 94S00-0801-MS-9 (Ind. Mar. 28, 2008)