Opinion
No. 29,020.
June 24, 1932.
Appeal and error — nonappealable order.
An order of the district court dismissing an appeal from probate court is not appealable.
Bertha Otting as proponent of the will of August Ploetz appealed from an order of the district court for LeSueur county, Tifft, J. dismissing her appeal to that court from an order of the probate court denying admission of the will to probate. Appeal dismissed.
L.P. Johnson, for appellant.
Thompson, Hessian Fletcher, for Henry Ploetz, contestant-respondent.
This will contest is here on attempted appeal from an order of the district court, made when the case was there called for trial, dismissing the appeal of Bertha Otting, proponent, to the district court from the order of the probate court denying probate of the supposed will.
Under the statute, G. S. 1923 (2 Mason, 1927) § 8988, the appeal from the probate court to the district court stood for trial de novo in the latter tribunal. The mere order of dismissal there was not appealable. Graham v. Conrad, 66 Minn. 470, 69 N.W. 215; Thompson v. Berg, 151 Minn. 560, 187 N.W. 703. If appellant wanted review here of that decision, our procedure required either a motion for a new trial or the entry of judgment of dismissal. In the one case an appeal could be taken from the order denying a new trial, and in the other from the judgment.
Respondent's motion to dismiss the appeal must be granted.
So ordered.