From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kimmel v. Doty

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 10, 1951
96 N.E.2d 297 (Ohio 1951)

Opinion

No. 32435

Decided January 10, 1951.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Executors and administrators — Exceptions to inventory — Exceptor claiming to be surviving spouse — Collateral attack on divorce decree not permitted — Validity of service of summons on nonresident — Affidavit or proof that residence unknown — Due process — Section 1, Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Madison county.

Mr. Gerald A. Baynes, for appellant.

Mr. Boyd P. Doty and Messrs. Lucas Lucas, for appellee.


It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kimmel v. Doty

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 10, 1951
96 N.E.2d 297 (Ohio 1951)
Case details for

Kimmel v. Doty

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ESTATE OF LOMBARD: KIMMEL, APPELLANT v. DOTY, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jan 10, 1951

Citations

96 N.E.2d 297 (Ohio 1951)
96 N.E.2d 297

Citing Cases

Wyckoff v. Wyckoff

Barenholtz v. Barenholtz (June 28, 1983), 11th Dist. No. 1249, citing In re Estate of Gingery (1921), 103…