See Murphy v. Maddaus, 2002 ME 24, ¶ 9 n.3, 789 A.2d 1281 ("The bare entry of an order granting a motion for summary judgment but lacking a description of relief . . . does not indicate the substance of the court's judgment required by [M.R. Civ. P.] 79(a) and thus is not an effective entry of judgment pursuant to [M.R. Civ. P.] 58."); see also Est. of Libby, 2018 ME 1, ¶ 10, 176 A.3d 1287; Foremost Ins. Co. v. Levesque, 2005 ME 34, ¶ 5 & n.2, 868 A.2d 244. Although the record lacks an express entry of final judgment, however, we consider the appeal rather than remanding for entry of a final judgment because the issues raised are "clearly presented and neither party has questioned the sufficiency of the court's order."