From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Estate of Bulhack

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION
Aug 26, 2011
DOCKET NO. A-3602-09T1 (App. Div. Aug. 26, 2011)

Opinion

DOCKET NO. A-3602-09T1

08-26-2011

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF PETER BULHACK, DECEASED.

David J. Finkler, attorney for appellant Robert Korzik, Administrator of the Estate of Peter Bulhack. Stein & Supsie, attorneys for respondents Paternal Heirs of the Estate of Peter Bulhack (Lucian Ulmet, of counsel; Angela M. Koutsouris, on the brief).


NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Before Judges R. B. Coleman and Lihotz.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Probate Part, Union County, Docket No. M-6450.

David J. Finkler, attorney for appellant Robert Korzik, Administrator of the Estate of Peter Bulhack.

Stein & Supsie, attorneys for respondents Paternal Heirs of the Estate of Peter Bulhack (Lucian Ulmet, of counsel; Angela M. Koutsouris, on the brief). PER CURIAM

Following our initial review of this matter, challenging the legitimacy of claims by decedent's putative paternal heirs, we remanded the matter to the trial court for the entry of additional limited factual findings regarding the documentary evidence submitted. Specifically, powers of attorney were filed by the Belarus plaintiffs, which the trial court was directed to verify the asserted self-proving character of the submissions and determine whether the documentary evidence proved claimants survived decedent.

We have received Judge Malone's opinion on remand dated May 13, 2011. The trial court reviewed the documents presented in the litigation by all heirs, paternal and maternal, to discern whether they survived decedent. Judge Malone concluded all eight plaintiffs had "provided copies of powers of attorney that were written in Russian with an English translation and signed by the individual granting the power [of attorney] to Richard A. Blake with respect to their claims as heirs to the Estate of Peter Bulhack." Judge Malone identified that the eight documents "contained an apostille and various seals to authenticate the document" and found these documents to be self-proving, "obviating the need for a final certification based on the contents of the documents[.]" Further, based on the dates of execution of the powers of attorney, the court found that each plaintiff survived decedent.

Based on these uncontroverted factual findings, we conclude the record is complete and the trial court's determination as to the legitimacy of the Belarus plaintiffs' claims as well as the ordered division of the estate shall not be disturbed.

Affirmed.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the original on file in my office.

___________________________

CLERK OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION


Summaries of

In re Estate of Bulhack

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION
Aug 26, 2011
DOCKET NO. A-3602-09T1 (App. Div. Aug. 26, 2011)
Case details for

In re Estate of Bulhack

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF PETER BULHACK, DECEASED.

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION

Date published: Aug 26, 2011

Citations

DOCKET NO. A-3602-09T1 (App. Div. Aug. 26, 2011)