Opinion
NO. 02-11-00475-CV
12-22-2011
ESTATE OF MARY LAVERNE BOORTZ, DECEASED
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF HOOD COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Mary Denise Langwell attempts to appeal the trial court's July 25, 2011 order removing her as independent executrix of the Estate of Mary Laverne Boortz. Appellant timely filed a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law, extending the deadline for filing the notice of appeal until October 24, 2011. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(4); Tex. R. Civ. P. 306c. But appellant did not file a notice of appeal until November 14, 2011, and there is no evidence that she mailed her notice of appeal during the time for filing a motion to extend. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b), 26.3.
On November 17, 2011, we sent appellant a letter expressing our concern that we lack jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was untimely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b), 26.1; Crites v. Collins, 284 S.W.3d 839, 840 (Tex. 2009) (indicating that the timely filing of a notice of appeal under rule 26.1 is jurisdictional). We informed appellant that unless she or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, this appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant filed a response, but it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal.
Because appellant's notice of appeal was untimely, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.