From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Essleiny A.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 27, 2016
142 A.D.3d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

09-27-2016

In re ESSLEINY A., and Another, Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Rafael A., Respondent–Appellant, Griselda P., Respondent, Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner–Respondent.

Larry S. Bachner, Jamaica, for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Elizabeth S. Natrella of counsel), for respondent. Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Riti P. Singh of counsel), attorney for the children.


Larry S. Bachner, Jamaica, for appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Elizabeth S. Natrella of counsel), for respondent.

Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Riti P. Singh of counsel), attorney for the children.

FRIEDMAN, J.P., ANDRIAS, RICHTER, GISCHE, KAHN, JJ.

Opinion Order of fact-finding, Family Court, Bronx County (Valerie A. Pels, J.), entered on or about May 14, 2015, which determined, after a hearing, that respondent father had neglected the subject children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Family Court's finding that the father neglected the children was supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct. Act § 1046[b] [i] ). The father was arrested upon exiting the family's building while possessing a half kilo of heroin. The arresting officer proceeded to search the apartment and discovered a kilo press, which is commonly used to compact heroin, in the children's bedroom. Further, one of the children testified that she had seen the father counting money with another man in the apartment. Finally, the Family Court was entitled to draw a negative inference against the father for failing to testify at the fact-finding hearing (see Matter of Jamie V., 110 A.D.3d 481, 973 N.Y.S.2d 117 [1st Dept.2013] ).

Taken as a whole, the evidence in the record suffices to create an inference that the father engaged in narcotics trafficking in the immediate proximity of the children and thereby created an imminent danger to the subject children's physical, mental, and emotional condition (see Family Ct. Act § 1012 [f][i] ; Matter of Jamie V., 110 A.D.3d 481, 973 N.Y.S.2d 117 [1st Dept.2013] ; Matter of Paul J., 6 A.D.3d 709, 775 N.Y.S.2d 373 [2d Dept. 2004] ).


Summaries of

In re Essleiny A.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 27, 2016
142 A.D.3d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

In re Essleiny A.

Case Details

Full title:In re ESSLEINY A., and Another, Dependent Children Under the Age of…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 27, 2016

Citations

142 A.D.3d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
37 N.Y.S.3d 542
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 6147

Citing Cases

Suffolk Cty. Dep't of Soc. Serv. v. T.-F. (In re C.-A.)

er of Jaielly R.H. [Kimberly V.], 132 A.D.3d 993, 993, 19 N.Y.S.3d 68; seeMatter of Majesty M. [Brandy P.],…

Sharon L. v. Kelvin D. (In re Kamryn D.)

The detective who executed the search warrant testified that he saw drug-packaging materials and several bags…