From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Espinoza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 5, 2012
1:12-MC-00032 BAM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2012)

Opinion

1:12-MC-00032 BAM

11-05-2012

IN RE EXTRADITION OF LUIS ESTEBAN LOPEZ ESPINOZA, a.k.a. El Grenas, a.k.a. Luisillo, Fugitive.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney CHRISTOPHER D. BAKER Assistant U.S. Attorneys Attorneys for the United States of America BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney CHRISTOPHER D. BAKER Assistant U.S. Attorney H. TY KHARAZI Attorney for Luis Esteban Lopez Espinoza


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
CHRISTOPHER D. BAKER
Assistant U.S. Attorneys
Attorneys for the
United States of America

AMENDED

STIPULATION CONTINUING STATUS

CONFERENCE; ORDER


Judge: Honorable Oberto

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that the status conference now set for November 8, 2012, may be continued to December 20, 2012, at 1:30 p.m.

The reason for the continuance is to allow for Mexico's transmittal and the United States' receipt of a formal extradition request and supporting evidence. Specifically, pursuant to Article 11 of the extradition treaty in force between the United States and Mexico (31 U.S.T. 5059; TIAS 9656), Mexico must transmit to the United States its extradition request and accompanying evidence by November 25, 2012. The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the fugitive in a speedy trial and that the delay from the continuance shall be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By:_______________

CHRISTOPHER D. BAKER

Assistant U.S. Attorney

_______________

H. TY KHARAZI

Attorney for Luis Esteban Lopez

Espinoza

ORDER

The intervening period of delay shall be excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

In re Espinoza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 5, 2012
1:12-MC-00032 BAM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2012)
Case details for

In re Espinoza

Case Details

Full title:IN RE EXTRADITION OF LUIS ESTEBAN LOPEZ ESPINOZA, a.k.a. El Grenas, a.k.a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 5, 2012

Citations

1:12-MC-00032 BAM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2012)