From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ernst Young

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Feb 4, 2004
No. 05-04-00046-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 4, 2004)

Opinion

No. 05-04-00046-CV.

Opinion Issued February 4, 2004.

Original Proceeding from the County Court, at Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 03-06291-C.

Writ of Mandamus Denied.

Before Justices WRIGHT, MOSELEY, and RICHTER.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relators contend the trial judge erred in denying their motion to compel arbitration. The facts of this original proceeding are known to the parties so we do not recite them here. Further, because all dispositive issues are clearly settled in law, we issue this memorandum opinion pursuant to rule 52.8(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(d). Based on the record presented, we conclude the relators have not shown trial judge abused his discretion in denying their motion to compel arbitration. Accordingly, relators' petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(a); Prudential Secs., Inc. v. Marshall, 909 S.W.2d 896, 898 (Tex. 1995) (orig. proceeding).


Summaries of

In re Ernst Young

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Feb 4, 2004
No. 05-04-00046-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 4, 2004)
Case details for

In re Ernst Young

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ERNST YOUNG, LLP., ERNST YOUNG U.S., LLP., ERNST YOUNG…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Feb 4, 2004

Citations

No. 05-04-00046-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 4, 2004)