From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re ERB Indus.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 15, 2020
2019-1193 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 15, 2020)

Opinion

2019-1193

01-15-2020

IN RE: ERB INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant

ERIK PELTON, Erik M. Pelton & Associates, PLLC, Falls Church, VA, argued for appellant. THOMAS L. CASAGRANDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by CHRISTINA J. HIEBER, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, MAUREEN DONOVAN QUELER.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No. 86826889.

JUDGMENT

ERIK PELTON, Erik M. Pelton & Associates, PLLC, Falls Church, VA, argued for appellant. THOMAS L. CASAGRANDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by CHRISTINA J. HIEBER, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, MAUREEN DONOVAN QUELER. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, TARANTO, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 15, 2020

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re ERB Indus.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 15, 2020
2019-1193 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 15, 2020)
Case details for

In re ERB Indus.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: ERB INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 15, 2020

Citations

2019-1193 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 15, 2020)