From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Eplus, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 8, 2013
540 F. App'x 998 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Opinion

2012-1451

11-08-2013

IN RE EPLUS, INC.

JENNIFER A. ALBERT, Goodwin Procter LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. With her on the brief were THOMAS J. SCOTT, JR., SCOTT L. ROBERTSON, DAVID M. YOUNG, and ELEANOR HYNES YOST. KRISTI L. R. SAWERT, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor and ROBERT J. MCMANUS, Associate Solicitor.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, in Reexamination No. 90/008,104.

JUDGMENT

JENNIFER A. ALBERT, Goodwin Procter LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. With her on the brief were THOMAS J. SCOTT, JR., SCOTT L. ROBERTSON, DAVID M. YOUNG, and ELEANOR HYNES YOST.

KRISTI L. R. SAWERT, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor and ROBERT J. MCMANUS, Associate Solicitor. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

_________________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Eplus, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 8, 2013
540 F. App'x 998 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
Case details for

In re Eplus, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE EPLUS, INC.

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 8, 2013

Citations

540 F. App'x 998 (Fed. Cir. 2013)