In re Enron Corp.

Full title: IN RE: ENRON CORP, et al., Chapter 11, Debtors

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Apr 10, 2003

Case No. 16034 [AJG] Jointly Administered (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Apr. 10, 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 16034 [AJG] Jointly Administered

April 10, 2003

ORDER CLARIFYING SECOND AMENDED RULE 2004 SHARING ORDER

ARTHUR J. GONZALEZ, United States Bankruptcy Judge

Upon consideration of the Motion dated March 5, 2003 (the "Motion") filed on behalf of The Regents of the University of California ("The Regents"), for an order directing the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the "Committee") to Comply with the Website Protocol Order Entered on March 15, 2002; and the Court having jurisdiction to consider the Motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157 and 1334; and it appearing that due and proper notice of the Motion and the relief requested therein having been given in accordance with this Court's Amended Case Management Order Establishing, among other things, Noticing Electronic Procedures, Hearing Dates, Independent Website and Alternative Methods of Participating at Hearings, dated February 26, 2002, and no other or further notice need be given; and the Committee having filed an Objection to The Regents' Motion (the "Objection"); and the Court having reviewed the Motion and Objection; and the interested parties having reached an agreement resolving the Motion; it is hereby

ORDERED that the Second Amended Rule 2004 Sharing Order (the "Sharing Order") is clarified as follows:

1. The Committee and the Examiner shall provide the notice described in Paragraph 1 of the Sharing Order to parties in interest within 5 business days of the receipt of Rule 2004 Material from a Producing Party.

2. Paragraph 2 of the Sharing Order permits a Requesting Party to request access to Rule 2004 Materials at any time after the Committee and the Examiner provide the notice described in Paragraph 1 of the Order. However, if a Requesting Party is granted access to Rule 2004 Material under the terms of the Sharing Order, nothing in the Sharing Order shall be construed to obligate the Committee or the Examiner to provide the Requesting Party access to the Rule 2004 Material until such material is posted on the Rule 2004 Internet Repository.

3. Third-party vendors who are responsible for processing documents received from counsel for the Committee and/or the Examiner or who are responsible for posting the documents to the Rule 2004 Internet Repository are directed to perform their respective functions as soon as practicable.