From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ellis

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 13, 2017
2016-2372 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 13, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2372

12-13-2017

IN RE: LAWRENCE A. ELLIS, Appellant

MICHAEL LAWRENCE OLIVERIO, Polsinelli PC, Boston, MA, argued for appellant. PHILIP J. WARRICK, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MONICA BARNES LATEEF.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/567,063.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL LAWRENCE OLIVERIO, Polsinelli PC, Boston, MA, argued for appellant. PHILIP J. WARRICK, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MONICA BARNES LATEEF. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, O'MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 13, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Ellis

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 13, 2017
2016-2372 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 13, 2017)
Case details for

In re Ellis

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: LAWRENCE A. ELLIS, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 13, 2017

Citations

2016-2372 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 13, 2017)