From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Egenberg

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Sep 6, 2012
211 N.J. 604 (N.J. 2012)

Opinion

2012-09-6

In the Matter of Howard L. EGENBERG, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 006641974).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11–418, concluding that HOWARD L. EGENBERG of NORTH ARLINGTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.7(a) (conflict of interest), RPC 4.1(a) (knowingly making a false statement of material fact or law to a third person), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct-involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that HOWARD L. EGENBERG is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Egenberg

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Sep 6, 2012
211 N.J. 604 (N.J. 2012)
Case details for

In re Egenberg

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Howard L. EGENBERG, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Sep 6, 2012

Citations

211 N.J. 604 (N.J. 2012)
50 A.3d 38

Citing Cases

In re Lauletta

payment of the annual fee required of Pennsylvania attorneys; compelling mitigation); In re Liptak, 217 N.J.…

In re Douglass

, In re Walcott, 217 N.J. 367 (2014) (attorney misrepresented to a third party, in writing, that he was…