Opinion
No. 08-12-00094-CV
04-04-2012
In re: E.E. HOOD & SONS, INC., Relator.
AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN MANDAMUS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On March 13, 2012, Relator filed its Motion for Review of Trial Court's Rule 24.2(d) Order or Alternatively, Petition for Writ of Mandamus. We originally determined that Relator's filing should be addressed as a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and filed it as such. Upon further evaluation of the arguments, authority, and evidence presented by the parties, we now determine that the matters raised by Relator's filing are properly presented for our consideration as a Motion for Review under Rule 24.4(a). TEX.R.APP.P. 24.2(d), 24.4. We therefore dismiss Relator's Petition for Writ of Mandamus and re-file Relator's filing as a Motion for Review pursuant to Rule 24(a) in a pending appeal, David Nelson, Individually and d/b/a Collective Contracting, A Sole Proprietorship, Collective Contracting, Inc., and E.E. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. Vernco Construction, Inc. (Cause No. 08-10-00222-CV). TEX.R.APP.P. 24.4.
______________________________
ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice
Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.
Rivera, J., not participating