From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Clausen

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 13, 2016
128 A.3d 692 (N.J. 2016)

Opinion

01-13-2016

In the Matter of Paul F. CLAUSEN, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 015951982).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15–087, concluding that PAUL F. CLAUSEN of CLINTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PAUL F. CLAUSEN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Clausen

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 13, 2016
128 A.3d 692 (N.J. 2016)
Case details for

In re Clausen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Paul F. CLAUSEN, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jan 13, 2016

Citations

128 A.3d 692 (N.J. 2016)
224 N.J. 30

Citing Cases

In re Clausen

On January 13, 2016, respondent received a second reprimand for gross neglect, lack of diligence, and failure…

In re Clausen

On January 13, 2016, respondent received a second reprimand for gross neglect, lack of diligence, and failure…