From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Eddins

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Aug 24, 2017
No. 05-17-00868-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 24, 2017)

Opinion

No. 05-17-00868-CV

08-24-2017

IN RE DARLA JALANE EDDINS, Relator


Original Proceeding from the 254th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DF13-23371-R

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Evans, and Stoddart
Opinion by Justice Stoddart

In this original proceeding, relator complains of temporary orders in a Suit Affecting the Parent Child Relationship. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown that the trial court abused its discretion. Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

/Craig Stoddart/

CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE 170868F.P05


Summaries of

In re Eddins

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Aug 24, 2017
No. 05-17-00868-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 24, 2017)
Case details for

In re Eddins

Case Details

Full title:IN RE DARLA JALANE EDDINS, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Aug 24, 2017

Citations

No. 05-17-00868-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 24, 2017)