From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re D.W.

State of Texas in the Eleventh Court of Appeals
Dec 17, 2015
No. 11-15-00308-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 17, 2015)

Opinion

No. 11-15-00308-CV

12-17-2015

IN THE INTEREST OF D.W., A CHILD


On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Ector County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CC2-3302-PC

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from an order in which the trial court terminated the parental rights of D.W.'s parents. An appeal in a parental termination case is an accelerated appeal. TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 263.405(a) (West 2014); TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4. The trial court signed the order of termination on October 22, 2015. Appellant, the mother of the child, filed a notice of appeal on December 2, 2015, and an amended notice of appeal on December 3. Because this is an accelerated appeal, Appellant's notice of appeal was due within twenty days after the order was signed, which would have made it due on November 12, 2015, because the twentieth day—November 11—was a holiday. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 26.1(b). Even with the fifteen-day extension allowed by TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, the time for filing the notice of appeal in this case had already expired when Appellant filed her notice of appeal. In a letter dated December 2, 2015, we informed counsel for Appellant that the notice of appeal appeared to be untimely. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b), 28.1(b). We requested that Appellant respond on or before December 7 and show grounds to continue the appeal. We also informed Appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.

In response to this court's letter, Appellant has filed a motion for extension of time to file appeal. However, we are without authority to grant such a motion for extension. Absent a timely notice of appeal, this court is without jurisdiction to consider an appeal. Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care Sys., 160 S.W.3d 559, 563 (Tex. 2005); Garza v. Hibernia Nat'l Bank, 227 S.W.3d 233, 234 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.); see also Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 2, we are prohibited from suspending the Rules of Appellate Procedure "to alter the time for perfecting an appeal in a civil case." We dismiss this appeal in accordance with TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM December 17, 2015 Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
Willson, J., and Bailey, J.


Summaries of

In re D.W.

State of Texas in the Eleventh Court of Appeals
Dec 17, 2015
No. 11-15-00308-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 17, 2015)
Case details for

In re D.W.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF D.W., A CHILD

Court:State of Texas in the Eleventh Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 17, 2015

Citations

No. 11-15-00308-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 17, 2015)