From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Dunnigan

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Feb 11, 2022
No. 03-22-00044-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 11, 2022)

Opinion

03-22-00044-CV

02-11-2022

In re Jeremiah Dunnigan


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM GAINES COUNTY

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE

Relator Jeremiah Dunnigan filed a pro se original petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221; see also Tex.R.App.P. 52.1. Relator complains that he has been unlawfully confined prior to trial.

As an intermediate appellate court, we may issue writs of habeas corpus against a district judge or county judge only sitting in our district, or to enforce our jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221. We lack jurisdiction to issue the requested writ against the respondent, listed as the 106th District Court of Gaines County, because this Court neither has jurisdiction over the district courts of Gaines County nor is such a writ necessary to enforce this Court's appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221(a), (b)(1); see also id. § 22.201(d) (listing the counties composing the Third Court of Appeal District). The Eleventh Court of Appeals in Eastland has jurisdiction over Gaines County district courts. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.201(1), 22.205(a). Accordingly, we dismiss relator's application for writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).


Summaries of

In re Dunnigan

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Feb 11, 2022
No. 03-22-00044-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 11, 2022)
Case details for

In re Dunnigan

Case Details

Full title:In re Jeremiah Dunnigan

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Feb 11, 2022

Citations

No. 03-22-00044-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 11, 2022)