In re Dunn

Full title: IN RE MICHAEL RAY DUNN, A/K/A TERRY NEWTON SANDERS

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo

Date published: Jan 13, 2003

No. 07-03-0011-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 13, 2003)

Opinion

No. 07-03-0011-CV.

January 13, 2003.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

PANEL E: Before JOHNSON, C.J., REAVIS, J. and BOYD, S.J.¹

1 John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PHIL JOHNSON, Chief Justice.

Relator Michael Ray Dunn a/k/a Terry Newton Sanders, seeks issuance of a writ of mandamus against respondents the Honorable John Board, Judge of the 181st District Court of Potter County, and Rebecca King, District Attorney of Potter County. We deny the petition.

When petition for writ of mandamus is made, it is the relator's burden to show entitlement to the relief being requested. See generally Johnson v. Fourth District Court of Appeals, 700 S.W.2d 916, 917 (Tex. 1985) (orig. proceeding). Relator must file with the petition a certified sworn copy of every document that is material to relator's claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding, and a properly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony from any underlying proceeding including any exhibits offered in evidence or a statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with the matter complained of. Tex.R.App.P. 52.7(a).

Relator's petition contains only allegations. Certified, sworn copies of motions and correspondence referenced in the petition are not attached or furnished, nor is any other document or transcript. Relator has not presented a record which shows entitlement to the relief sought, or upon which we are authorized to act.