From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re D.T.S.

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
May 1, 2014
NO. 09-13-00521-CV (Tex. App. May. 1, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 09-13-00521-CV

05-01-2014

IN THE INTEREST OF D.T.S.


On Appeal from the 317th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-208,450-B


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 5, 2014, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed unless the appellant remitted the filing fee for the appeal. On March 13, 2014, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why additional time was needed to file the record. Appellant did not respond.

Appellant did not file an affidavit of indigence on appeal and has not shown that she is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to pay the filing fee for the appeal, and there being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the clerk's record, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

______________________

HOLLIS HORTON

Justice
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.


Summaries of

In re D.T.S.

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
May 1, 2014
NO. 09-13-00521-CV (Tex. App. May. 1, 2014)
Case details for

In re D.T.S.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF D.T.S.

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: May 1, 2014

Citations

NO. 09-13-00521-CV (Tex. App. May. 1, 2014)