From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re D.P.J.

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Mar 8, 2012
NO. 09-11-00091-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 8, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 09-11-00091-CV

03-08-2012

IN THE INTEREST OF D.P.J. AND B.J.D.


On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 10-03-02583 CV


MEMORANDUM OPINION

B.J.H. appeals from an order terminating her parental rights to the minor children D.P.J. and B.J.D. The trial court found, by clear and convincing evidence, that statutory grounds existed for the termination and that termination of B.J.H.'s parental rights would be in the best interest of the children. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 161.001(1)(E), (O), (P), (2) (West Supp. 2011). B.J.H.'s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes there are no arguable points of error. See In the Interest of L.D.T., 161 S.W.3d 728, 731 (Tex. App.— Beaumont 2005, no pet.). This Court notified B.J.H. that she could file a pro se response. She did not file a response. This Court reviewed the record. Nothing suggests counsel's conclusion is incorrect. Appointment of new counsel is not required under the circumstances. See id. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

________________________

DAVID GAULTNEY

Justice
Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.


Summaries of

In re D.P.J.

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Mar 8, 2012
NO. 09-11-00091-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 8, 2012)
Case details for

In re D.P.J.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF D.P.J. AND B.J.D.

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Mar 8, 2012

Citations

NO. 09-11-00091-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 8, 2012)