From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Doria

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jul 13, 2017
230 N.J. 47 (N.J. 2017)

Opinion

07-13-2017

In the MATTER OF Nicholas R. DORIA, an Attorney At Law (Attorney No. 022661977)


ORDER

This matter have been duly presented pursuant to Rule 1:20–10(b), following a granting of a motion for discipline by consent in DRB 17–084 of NICHOLAS R. DORIA of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1977;

And the District XI Ethics Committee and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent violated RPC 1.5(a) (unreasonable fee);

And the parties having agreed that respondent's conduct violated RPC 1.5(a), and that said conduct warrants a reprimand or such lesser discipline as the Board deems appropriate;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a reprimand is the appropriate discipline for respondent's unethical conduct and having granted the motion for discipline by consent in District Docket No. XI–2015–0010E;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with Rule 1:20–16(e);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that NICHOLAS R. DORIA of HACKENSACK is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Doria

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jul 13, 2017
230 N.J. 47 (N.J. 2017)
Case details for

In re Doria

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Nicholas R. DORIA, an Attorney At Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jul 13, 2017

Citations

230 N.J. 47 (N.J. 2017)
164 A.3d 1056

Citing Cases

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith

See, e.g.. In re Doria. 230 N.J. 47 (2017) (attorney refused to return any portion of a $35,000…

In re Trella

Where, however, the attorney's fees are so excessive as to evidence an intent to overreach the client, a…