From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Donovan C.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 10, 2019
176 A.D.3d 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

10039

10-10-2019

IN RE DONOVAN C., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Presentment Agency

Dawne A. Mitchell, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Raymond E. Rogers of counsel), for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Anna B. Wolonciej of counsel), for presentment agency.


Dawne A. Mitchell, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Raymond E. Rogers of counsel), for appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Anna B. Wolonciej of counsel), for presentment agency.

Manzanet–Daniels, J.P., Kern, Oing, Singh, JJ.

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Gayle P. Roberts, J.), entered on or about July 17, 2018, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of sexual abuse in the first and third degrees, and imposed a conditional discharge for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). There is no basis for disturbing the court's credibility determinations. The victim's delay in reporting the incident was adequately explained. We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining arguments on this issue.

The court also providently exercised its discretion in adjudicating appellant a juvenile delinquent and imposing a 12–month conditional discharge, which was the least restrictive dispositional alternative consistent with appellant's needs and the community's need for protection (see Matter of Katherine W., 62 N.Y.2d 947, 479 N.Y.S.2d 190, 468 N.E.2d 28 [1984] ), given, among other things, the seriousness of the underlying sexual offense against a young child. An adjournment in contemplation of dismissal would not have ensured that, after its term expired, appellant would have remained in and completed an appropriate treatment program.


Summaries of

In re Donovan C.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 10, 2019
176 A.D.3d 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

In re Donovan C.

Case Details

Full title:In re Donovan C., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 10, 2019

Citations

176 A.D.3d 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
107 N.Y.S.3d 861
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 7330

Citing Cases

People v. Duncanson

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the discrepancies in the complainant's testimony were not of such…

People v. Duncanson

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the discrepancies in the complainant's testimony were not of such…