Opinion
23-1085
03-24-2023
In re: JOHN DOE, Petitioner.
John Doe, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: March 21, 2023
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:01-cr-00027-M-1)
John Doe, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
John Doe petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motions for relief under the First Step Act. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, while we grant Doe leave to proceed by pseudonym, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED