Opinion
21-1746
09-17-2021
In re: JOHN DOE, Petitioner.
John Doe, Petitioner Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: September 14, 2021
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:01-cr-00027-M-1)
John Doe, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
John Doe petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion to seal. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court and the district court has taken significant action in this case by denying Doe's motion for relief under the First Step Act. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED