From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Doe

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 17, 2020
No. 20-1013 (4th Cir. Apr. 17, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-1013

04-17-2020

In re: JOHN DOE, Petitioner.

John Doe, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:01-cr-00027-BO-1) Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Doe, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John Doe petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motions for bond and appointment of counsel. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court ruled on his motion on January 15, 2020. Accordingly, because the district court has recently ruled on Doe's motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Doe

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 17, 2020
No. 20-1013 (4th Cir. Apr. 17, 2020)
Case details for

In re Doe

Case Details

Full title:In re: JOHN DOE, Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 17, 2020

Citations

No. 20-1013 (4th Cir. Apr. 17, 2020)