From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Doe

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jul 23, 1981
432 A.2d 327 (R.I. 1981)

Opinion

Nos. 79-92-Appeal to 79-94-Appeal and 79-166-Appeal.

July 23, 1981.

Paul J. Pisano, Legal Counsel, Mental Health, Retardation and Hospitals, Providence, for petitioners.

Joseph T. Feeley, Asst. Mental Health Advocate, Providence, for respondent.


OPINION


These four appeals deal with the rights of individuals who may have been involuntarily committed for in-patient psychiatric care and treatment at the state's Institute of Mental Health. John, Richard, and Joseph were committed by orders entered in the District Court, while Nancy was committed by an order of the Family Court. Their appeals have been prosecuted by the mental-health advocate.

Since the court as presently constituted is equally divided as to the interpretation to be given the various time constraints found within G.L. 1956 (1977 Reenactment) chapter 5 of title 40.1 (the "Mental Health Law"), the appeals of John, Richard, Joseph, and Nancy are denied and dismissed and the respective orders appealed from are affirmed.

SHEA, J., did not participate in the consideration or the decision of this case.


Summaries of

In re Doe

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jul 23, 1981
432 A.2d 327 (R.I. 1981)
Case details for

In re Doe

Case Details

Full title:In re John DOE. In re Richard ROE. In re Joseph ROE. In re NANCY

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: Jul 23, 1981

Citations

432 A.2d 327 (R.I. 1981)

Citing Cases

In re John Doe

ORDER The respondents' motion to reargue, R.I., 432 A.2d 327, is granted.…

In re Doe

We, however, granted a subsequent motion for reargument. In Re Doe, R.I., 432 A.2d 327, reh. granted, R.I.,…