From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Doe

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Feb 10, 2009
No. 01-09-00080-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 10, 2009)

Opinion

No. 01-09-00080-CR

Opinion issued February 10, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Panel consists of Justices TAFT, BLAND, and SHARP.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Using an assumed name, relator John Doe filed a petition for a writ of mandamus complaining of Judge Derbyshire's January 29, 2009 order denying an application for extraordinary relief. Relator sought relief in the county criminal court at law to stop proceedings in the municipal court of the City of Bellaire set for February 10, 2009. On February 5, 2009, this Court struck relator's petition for failure to identify the relator. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1. The Court notified relator that unless a conforming petition was filed no later than 10:00 a.m. on February 9, 2009, then the Court may dismiss the proceeding for want of prosecution without further notice. Relator has not filed a conforming petition. We dismiss the proceeding for want of prosecution.

The Honorable Pam Derbyshire, judge of the County Criminal Court at LawNo. 7of Harris County, Texas. The county court lawsuit is In re Doe, No. 5530(County Crim. Ct. at Law No. 7, Harris County, Tex.); the underlyingmunicipal court lawsuit is State v. [relator], No. 0183261-01 (Bellaire, Tex.Mun. Ct.).


Summaries of

In re Doe

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Feb 10, 2009
No. 01-09-00080-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 10, 2009)
Case details for

In re Doe

Case Details

Full title:IN RE JOHN DOE (ASSUMED NAME), Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Feb 10, 2009

Citations

No. 01-09-00080-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 10, 2009)