From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Dobranski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 14, 2010
69 A.D.3d 1091 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 507287.

January 14, 2010.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McGrath, J.), entered February 20, 2009 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner's request for parole release.

Bernard J. Dobranski, Attica, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Malone Jr. and McCarthy, JJ., concur.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a January 2008 determination of the Board of Parole denying his request for parole release. The Attorney General has advised this Court that petitioner reappeared before the Board in November 2009 and that his request for parole release was again denied. In view of his reappearance, the appeal must be dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Johnson v New York State Div. of Parole, 54 AD3d 464, 464-465, lv denied 11 NY3d 711; Matter of Lebron v Travis, 47 AD3d 1142, lv denied 10 NY3d 707). Contrary to petitioner's claim, we do not find this matter to present an exception to the mootness doctrine ( see Matter of Banks v Dennison, 57 AD3d 2041 [2008], lv dismissed 12 NY3d 905).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Dobranski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 14, 2010
69 A.D.3d 1091 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Dobranski

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BERNARD J. DOBRANSKI, Appellant, v. GEORGE B. ALEXANDER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 14, 2010

Citations

69 A.D.3d 1091 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 349
891 N.Y.S.2d 676

Citing Cases

In re Brown

We affirm. Petitioner's reappearance before the Board in September 2008 rendered his challenge to its prior…

Hill v. Annucci (In re Matter of Hill)

Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his CPLR article 78 petition seeking to annul the…