From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re D.L.

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Mar 29, 2012
NO. 09-11-00696-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 29, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 09-11-00696-CV

03-29-2012

IN THE INTEREST OF D.L., JR., C.L.L. AND M.R.


On Appeal from the 279th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. F-160,852-E


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 8, 2012, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why additional time was needed to file the record. The appellant did not respond to the Court's notice. The appellant did not file an affidavit of indigence and is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Costs are assessed against the appellant.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________

STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.


Summaries of

In re D.L.

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Mar 29, 2012
NO. 09-11-00696-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 29, 2012)
Case details for

In re D.L.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF D.L., JR., C.L.L. AND M.R.

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Mar 29, 2012

Citations

NO. 09-11-00696-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 29, 2012)