From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Disqualification of Spahr

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 1, 1987
36 Ohio St. 3d 603 (Ohio 1987)

Opinion

No. 87-AP-270

Decided December 1, 1987.

Judges — Affidavit of disqualification — Refusal to grant continuance not by itself evidence of bias or prejudice — Affidavit filed solely to obtain delay is abuse of R.C. 2701.03.

ON AFFIDAVIT OF DISQUALIFICATION.


The affidavit of disqualification filed herein alleges the refusal of Judge Jon R. Spahr to grant a continuance to plaintiffs, Linda Frazier et al., in case No. 84-S-78416 in the Court of Common Pleas of Licking County, as grounds for disqualification.

A trial judge's ruling on a motion for a continuance is not by itself evidence of bias or prejudice, and affiant does not even imply any other evidence.

Furthermore, this affidavit, as well as other affidavits of disqualification filed by this affiant, appears to have been filed solely to obtain a delay of the scheduled hearing. Affidavits filed to obtain a delay are an abuse of the purpose for which R.C. 2701.03 is intended, are a waste of judicial resources, and, if repeated, could result in appropriate action being taken against an offending person.

The affidavit filed herein is found not well-taken and is hereby dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Disqualification of Spahr

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 1, 1987
36 Ohio St. 3d 603 (Ohio 1987)
Case details for

In re Disqualification of Spahr

Case Details

Full title:IN RE DISQUALIFICATION OF SPAHR: FRAZIER ET AL. v. DWIGGINS ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 1, 1987

Citations

36 Ohio St. 3d 603 (Ohio 1987)
522 N.E.2d 457

Citing Cases

In re Disqualification of Suster

It is well settled, however, that a judge's decision to grant or deny a motion for a continuance is within…

In re Disqualification of Pontious

A judge's decision to grant or deny a party's request for a continuance is within the sound discretion of the…