From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Discipline

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Mar 2, 2020
S259925 (Cal. Mar. 2, 2020)

Opinion

S259925

03-02-2020

SCHMUTZ ON DISCIPLINE


Recommended discipline imposed

The court orders that JOHN ERIC SCHMUTZ (Respondent), State Bar Number 186517, is suspended from the practice of law in California for two years, execution of that period of suspension is stayed, and Respondent is placed on probation for two years subject to the following conditions:

1. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for the first 30 days of probation;

2. Respondent must comply with the other conditions of probation recommended by the Hearing Department of the State Bar Court in its Order Approving Stipulation filed on November 12, 2019; and

3. At the expiration of the period of probation, if Respondent has complied with all conditions of probation, the period of stayed suspension will be satisfied, and that suspension will be terminated.

Respondent must provide to the State Bar's Office of Probation proof of taking and passing the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination as recommended by the Hearing Department in its Order Approving Stipulation filed on November 12, 2019. Failure to do so may result in suspension. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.10(b).)

Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section 6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7 and as a money judgment.


Summaries of

In re Discipline

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Mar 2, 2020
S259925 (Cal. Mar. 2, 2020)
Case details for

In re Discipline

Case Details

Full title:SCHMUTZ ON DISCIPLINE

Court:California Supreme Court (Minute Order)

Date published: Mar 2, 2020

Citations

S259925 (Cal. Mar. 2, 2020)