From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Omdahl

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Mar 18, 2010
2010 WI 18 (Wis. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2009AP957-D.

Decided March 18, 2010.

MOTION for reconsideration. Reconsideration denied.


This is a motion for reconsideration filed by the respondent, Attorney Torger G. Omdahl, seeking clarification or modification of portions of the opinion issued in this matter on January 21, 2010. The motion contends that certain facts described in the opinion, which were based upon the 2008 Michigan disciplinary complaint, are inaccurate because the subsequent stipulation in the 2008 Michigan disciplinary proceeding called for certain professional misconduct charges to be dismissed.

¶ 2. The motion ignores the fact, however, that the first paragraph of the 2008 Michigan stipulation states as follows: "Respondent, Torger G. Omdahl, pleads no contest to the factual allegations contained in Formal Complaint ADB Case No. 08-138-GA." Thus, while certain charges of rule violations were dismissed pursuant to the stipulation, Attorney Omdahl pled no contest to all of the factual allegations in the 2008 Michigan complaint. This court's opinion accurately summarizes those factual allegations.

¶ 3. Accordingly, the motion for reconsideration is denied, but the original opinion is modified by substituting the word "Medicare" for the word "Medicaid" in ¶ 4 and by deleting ¶ 6 as follows:

¶ 4. The second public reprimand was issued in December 2008 by the State of Michigan Attorney Discipline Board, Upper Peninsula Hearing Panel #2, again pursuant to Attorney Omdahl's stipulation. This public reprimand grew out of Attorney Omdahl's handling of certain settlement funds belonging to client F.T.4 Attorney Omdahl withheld $5,000 from a settlement that Attorney Omdahl received on F.T.'s behalf on the alleged ground that the funds needed to be maintained in trust in case a Medicare lien was filed. Attorney Omdahl placed the $5,000 of F.T.'s money into an account that his firm considered a client trust account, but which was not specifically designated as a trust account in the bank's records establishing the account.

¶ 6. [Deleted]


Summaries of

In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Omdahl

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Mar 18, 2010
2010 WI 18 (Wis. 2010)
Case details for

In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Omdahl

Case Details

Full title:IN the MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST Torger G. OMDAHL…

Court:Supreme Court of Wisconsin

Date published: Mar 18, 2010

Citations

2010 WI 18 (Wis. 2010)
2010 WI 18
781 N.W.2d 228

Citing Cases

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Stoltman (In re Stoltman)

It correctly notes that in a similar situation where this court became aware of two public reprimands in…