From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

IN RE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST VAN LIEW

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Mar 31, 2006
712 N.W.2d 758 (Minn. 2006)

Summary

imposing a 90-day suspension

Summary of this case from In re Sea

Opinion

No. A05-1772.

March 31, 2006.


ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Steven Wayne Van Liew committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, making false statements to a tribunal and failure to file opposition to a motion on behalf of a client, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 3.3(a)(1), 4.1, and 8.4(c), and (d).

Respondent has agreed not to contest the referee's findings and conclusions, waives his right to a hearing before this court under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and has entered into a stipulation with the Director in which the Director recommends, and respondent agrees not to oppose, that the appropriate discipline is a 90-day suspension, subject to the following conditions:

(a) Respondent must successfully complete the professional responsibility examination within one year from the date of this order.

(b) Respondent shall be current in continuing legal education requirements.

(c) Respondent shall pay $900 in costs and $90 in disbursements under Rule 24, RLPR.

(d) Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR, requiring notice of his suspension from active practice to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals.

(e) Respondent may apply for reinstatement by affidavit under Rule 18(f), RLPR.

The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Steven Wayne Van Liew is suspended from the practice of law for 90 days, effective immediately, subject to the conditions set forth above.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Helen M. Meyer Associate Justice


Summaries of

IN RE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST VAN LIEW

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Mar 31, 2006
712 N.W.2d 758 (Minn. 2006)

imposing a 90-day suspension

Summary of this case from In re Sea

imposing a 90-day suspension for making a false statement to a tribunal and failing to file opposition to a motion

Summary of this case from In re Sklar

imposing a 90–day suspension for an attorney who made false statements to a tribunal and failed to file opposition to a motion on behalf of a client

Summary of this case from In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Tayari-Garrett

imposing a 90-day suspension, subject to conditions, on an attorney who made false statements to a tribunal and failed to file opposition to a motion on behalf of a client, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 3.3, 4.1, and 8.4(c), and (d)

Summary of this case from In re Disciplinary Action
Case details for

IN RE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST VAN LIEW

Case Details

Full title:In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Steven Wayne VAN LIEW, a…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Mar 31, 2006

Citations

712 N.W.2d 758 (Minn. 2006)

Citing Cases

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Tayari-Garrett

2012) (imposing a 60–day suspension for an attorney who made a false statement to the court of appeals and…

In re Sklar

See In re Nwaneri , 896 N.W.2d 518, 525, 527 (Minn. 2017) (imposing a 30-day suspension for filing an…