From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Disciplinary Action Against Lorentzen

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT
Nov 15, 2019
935 N.W.2d 435 (Minn. 2019)

Summary

imposing an indefinite suspension with no right to petition for reinstatement for 3 years for soliciting a minor to engage in prostitution

Summary of this case from In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Strunk

Opinion

A19-0806

11-15-2019

IN RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Mark Stephen LORENTZEN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0230261.


ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Mark Stephen Lorentzen has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline by soliciting a minor to engage in prostitution, in violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.324, subd. 1(b)(2) (2018). See Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(b).

Respondent and the Director have entered into a stipulation for discipline. In it, respondent withdraws his previously filed answer, unconditionally admits the allegations of the petition, and waives his procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). The parties jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is an indefinite suspension with no right to petition for reinstatement for 3 years.

The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the recommended discipline.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Respondent Mark Stephen Lorentzen is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law, effective 14 days from the date of this order, with no right to petition for reinstatement for 3 years.

2. Respondent may petition for reinstatement pursuant to Rule 18(a)–(d), RLPR. Reinstatement is conditioned on successful completion of the written examination required for admission to the practice of law by the State Board of Law Examiners on the subject of professional responsibility, see Rule 18(e)(2), RLPR, and satisfaction of continuing legal education requirements, see Rule 18(e)(4), RLPR.

3. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals), and shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24(a)–(b), RLPR.


Summaries of

In re Disciplinary Action Against Lorentzen

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT
Nov 15, 2019
935 N.W.2d 435 (Minn. 2019)

imposing an indefinite suspension with no right to petition for reinstatement for 3 years for soliciting a minor to engage in prostitution

Summary of this case from In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Strunk
Case details for

In re Disciplinary Action Against Lorentzen

Case Details

Full title:In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Mark Stephen Lorentzen, a…

Court:STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT

Date published: Nov 15, 2019

Citations

935 N.W.2d 435 (Minn. 2019)

Citing Cases

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Strunk

Strunk asks us to accept the referee's recommended discipline, and turns to the discipline imposed in…

In re Huberty

But we have imposed lengthy suspensions when attorneys commit sexual offenses involving minors. See , e.g. ,…