From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Diehl

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 19, 2012
No. 1009 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Mar. 19, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1009 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 No. 18 DB 2005 Attorney Registration No. 64261

03-19-2012

In the Matter of ROSANNE KAY DIEHL PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT


(Allegheny County)


ORDER

PER CURIAM :

AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2012, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated November 15, 2011, the Petition for Reinstatement is denied.

Pursuant to Rule 218(f), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.


Summaries of

In re Diehl

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 19, 2012
No. 1009 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Mar. 19, 2012)
Case details for

In re Diehl

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROSANNE KAY DIEHL PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 19, 2012

Citations

No. 1009 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Mar. 19, 2012)