From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Dib

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 9, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1348 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

03-09-2017

In the Matter of Albert Hamilton DIB, an Attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 3018082).

Albert Hamilton Dib, Hackensack, New Jersey, pro se. Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.


Albert Hamilton Dib, Hackensack, New Jersey, pro se.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Before: McCARTHY, J.P., LYNCH, ROSE, CLARK and MULVEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Albert Hamilton Dib was admitted to practice by this Court in 2000 and lists a business address in Hackensack, New Jersey with the Office of Court Administration (hereinafter OCA). By notice of motion and affirmation dated June 16, 2016, Dib now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a] ). By correspondence from its Chief Attorney, the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) advises that it opposes Dib's application due to its improper form.

Dib's application was initially submitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, but was later resubmitted to this Court due to the fact that Dib has an out-of-state address on file with OCA and was admitted to practice by this Court (cf. Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.7 [a][2] ).

We agree with AGC that Dib inappropriately submitted an affirmation in support of his application to resign (see Matter of Lamson, 146 A.D.3d 1231, 1231–1232, 44 N.Y.S.3d 785 [2017] ; CPLR 2106[a] ; Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a][1]; Rules of App.Div., 3d Dept. [22 NYCRR] § 806.22 [a] ). Nonetheless, mindful that the application was submitted prior to the effective date of the Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters, and inasmuch as Dib's affirmation recited that the facts set forth therein were true and were made "under the penalties of perjury," we exercise our discretion to excuse the defect in Dib's application and address the merits thereof (see Matter of Lamson, 146 A.D.3d at 1232, 44 N.Y.S.3d 785).

Significantly, AGC does not substantively oppose Dib's application. Accordingly, upon reading the notice of motion and affirmation of Dib dated June 16, 2016, and upon reading the correspondence in response by AGC's Chief Attorney, and having determined that Dib is eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons, we grant his application and accept his resignation.

ORDERED that Albert Hamilton Dib's application to resign is granted and his nondisciplinary resignation is accepted; and it is further

ORDERED that Albert Hamilton Dib's name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court (see generally Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [b] ); and it is further

ORDERED that Albert Hamilton Dib shall, within 30 days of the date of this decision, surrender to the Office of Court Administration any Attorney Secure Pass issued to him.

McCARTHY, J.P., LYNCH, ROSE, CLARK and MULVEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Dib

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 9, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1348 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

In re Dib

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Albert Hamilton DIB, an Attorney. (Attorney Registration…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 9, 2017

Citations

148 A.D.3d 1348 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
47 N.Y.S.3d 921