From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Diaz

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Feb 8, 2012
209 N.J. 89 (N.J. 2012)

Opinion

2012-02-8

In the Matter of Nelson DIAZ, An Attorney at Law, (Attorney No. 007221987).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11–236, concluding that NELSON DIAZ of CHERRY HILL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 5.1(c)(1) (failure to supervise lawyer employee), RPC 5.3(c)(1) (failure to supervise nonlawyer employee), RPC 8.4(a) (violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another), RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that NELSON DIAZ is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Diaz

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Feb 8, 2012
209 N.J. 89 (N.J. 2012)
Case details for

In re Diaz

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Nelson DIAZ, An Attorney at Law, (Attorney No. 007221987).

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Feb 8, 2012

Citations

209 N.J. 89 (N.J. 2012)
35 A.3d 675

Citing Cases

In re Ehrlich

ined a New Jersey attorney, who provided proof that the defendant was not the proper party and requested the…

In re Benedetto

reprimand. See In re Kobin, 212 N.J. 291 (2012) (reprimand for attorney who failed to properly supervise his…