From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Diangelus

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 24, 2013
No. 1020 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Apr. 24, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1020 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 No. 189 DB 2003

04-24-2013

In the Matter of LAWRENCE J. DIANGELUS PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT


Attorney Registration No. 15492


(Delaware County)


ORDER

PER CURIAM :

AND NOW, this 24th day of April, 2013, the Petition for Oral Argument is denied and, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated January 3, 2013, the Petition for Reinstatement is hereby denied.

Pursuant to Rule 218(f), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.


Summaries of

In re Diangelus

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 24, 2013
No. 1020 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Apr. 24, 2013)
Case details for

In re Diangelus

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LAWRENCE J. DIANGELUS PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 24, 2013

Citations

No. 1020 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Apr. 24, 2013)