From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Devleeschouwer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 27, 2022
201 A.D.3d 1291 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

PM-16-22

01-27-2022

In the MATTER OF Davina M.F. DEVLEESCHOUWER, an Attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 5079017)

Davina M.F. Devleeschouwer, Brussels, Belgium, pro se. Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.


Davina M.F. Devleeschouwer, Brussels, Belgium, pro se.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Before: Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Pritzker and Colangelo, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION

Per Curiam.

Davina M.F. Devleeschouwer was admitted to practice by this Court in 2013 and lists a business address in Brussels, Belgium with the Office of Court Administration. Devleeschouwer now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a]). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) has been heard in response to the application by correspondence from its Chief Attorney.

As is noted by AGC, Devleeschouwer is presently delinquent in her New York attorney registration requirements, having failed to register for the biennial period beginning in 2021 (see Judiciary Law § 468–a ; Rules of the Chief Admin of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 118.1). Inasmuch as Devleeschouwer is therefore subject to potential disciplinary action (see Judiciary Law § 468–a [5] ; Rules of Professional Conduct [ 22 NYCRR 1200.0 ] rule 8.4[d]; see also Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a, 113 A.D.3d 1020, 1021, 979 N.Y.S.2d 548 [2014] ), she is ineligible for nondisciplinary resignation and her application must be denied (see Matter of Cluff, 148 A.D.3d 1346, 1346, 47 N.Y.S.3d 919 [2017] ; Matter of Bomba, 146 A.D.3d 1226, 1226–1227, 46 N.Y.S.3d 433 [2017] ). Further, any future application by Devleeschouwer must be supported by proof of her full satisfaction of the requirements of Judiciary Law § 468–a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 118.1 (see Matter of Frank, 146 A.D.3d 1228, 1228–1229, 46 N.Y.S.3d 434 [2017] ).

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Pritzker and Colangelo, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that Davina M.F. Devleeschouwer's application for permission to resign is denied.


Summaries of

In re Devleeschouwer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 27, 2022
201 A.D.3d 1291 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

In re Devleeschouwer

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Davina M.F. DEVLEESCHOUWER, an Attorney. (Attorney…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 27, 2022

Citations

201 A.D.3d 1291 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
158 N.Y.S.3d 649