Opinion
2022-1568
03-07-2023
Peter S. Dardi, Christensen Fonder Dardi & Herbert, PLLC, Maple Grove, MN, argued for appellants Haixia Deng, Yongbong Han, Charan Masarapu, Yogesh Kumar Anguchamy, Herman A. Lopez, Sujeet Kumar. Also represented by Donald W. Niles, Niles Law Office, P.A., Wadena, MN. Daniel Kazhdan, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by Thomas W. Krause, Amy J. Nelson, Brian Racilla, Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed.
This disposition is nonprecedential.
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 15/425,696.
Peter S. Dardi, Christensen Fonder Dardi & Herbert, PLLC, Maple Grove, MN, argued for appellants Haixia Deng, Yongbong Han, Charan Masarapu, Yogesh Kumar Anguchamy, Herman A. Lopez, Sujeet Kumar. Also represented by Donald W. Niles, Niles Law Office, P.A., Wadena, MN.
Daniel Kazhdan, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by Thomas W. Krause, Amy J. Nelson, Brian Racilla, Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed.
JUDGMENT
This Cause having been heard and considered, it is
Ordered and Adjudged:
Per Curiam (Chen, Mayer, and Hughes, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.