From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Deng

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Mar 7, 2023
No. 2022-1568 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2023)

Opinion

2022-1568

03-07-2023

IN RE: HAIXIA DENG, YONGBONG HAN, CHARAN MASARAPU, YOGESH KUMAR ANGUCHAMY, HERMAN A. LOPEZ, SUJEET KUMAR, Appellants

Peter S. Dardi, Christensen Fonder Dardi & Herbert, PLLC, Maple Grove, MN, argued for appellants Haixia Deng, Yongbong Han, Charan Masarapu, Yogesh Kumar Anguchamy, Herman A. Lopez, Sujeet Kumar. Also represented by Donald W. Niles, Niles Law Office, P.A., Wadena, MN. Daniel Kazhdan, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by Thomas W. Krause, Amy J. Nelson, Brian Racilla, Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 15/425,696.

Peter S. Dardi, Christensen Fonder Dardi & Herbert, PLLC, Maple Grove, MN, argued for appellants Haixia Deng, Yongbong Han, Charan Masarapu, Yogesh Kumar Anguchamy, Herman A. Lopez, Sujeet Kumar. Also represented by Donald W. Niles, Niles Law Office, P.A., Wadena, MN.

Daniel Kazhdan, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by Thomas W. Krause, Amy J. Nelson, Brian Racilla, Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed.

JUDGMENT

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

Per Curiam (Chen, Mayer, and Hughes, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

In re Deng

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Mar 7, 2023
No. 2022-1568 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2023)
Case details for

In re Deng

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: HAIXIA DENG, YONGBONG HAN, CHARAN MASARAPU, YOGESH KUMAR ANGUCHAMY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 7, 2023

Citations

No. 2022-1568 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2023)