In re Demus

Full title: IN RE LLOYD ERIC DEMUS, Relator

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Jan 25, 2011

Nos. 05-10-01667-CV, 05-10-01668-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 25, 2011)

Opinion

Nos. 05-10-01667-CV, 05-10-01668-CV

Opinion issued January 25, 2011.

Original Proceeding from the 265th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F-04-48171-R, F-04-57360-R.

Before Justices MOSELEY, FRANCIS, and FILLMORE.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by Justice FRANCIS.

Relator contends the trial court violated a ministerial duty by not ruling on his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); State of Texas ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 67 S.W.3d 177, 180-81 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); State of Tex. ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). Accordingly, we DENY relator's petition for writ of mandamus.