From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re D'Eliseo

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
Aug 30, 2010
CASE NO. 09-23455 (ASD), ADV. PRO. NO. 09-02066, RE: ECF NO. 46 (Bankr. D. Conn. Aug. 30, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 09-23455 (ASD), ADV. PRO. NO. 09-02066, RE: ECF NO. 46.

August 30, 2010


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, applicable to this adversary proceeding under Fed.R.Bankr.P. 7056, the Court having considered the Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (hereafter, the "Motion"), ECF No. 46, filed by the Plaintiff, Farrel D'Eliseo (hereafter, the "Plaintiff"), as well as the accompanying Amended Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and the Plaintiff's Local Rule 56(a)1 Statement (hereafter, the "Local Rule 56(a)1 Statement"); and

WHEREAS no Local Rule 56(a)2 Statement having been filed by the Defendant, Gino D'Eliseo (hereafter, the "Defendant") pursuant to the District of Connecticut Local Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a) within the requisite time; and WHEREAS notwithstanding the lack of a Local Rule 56(a)2 Statement by the pro se Defendant, the Court has examined the records of the adversary proceeding to ascertain whether the Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; and

The Motion was filed July 27, 2010. Local Rule 56(b) informs a pro se party opposing a Motion for Summary Judgment to file opposing documents, including a Local Rule 56(a)2 Statement, within twenty-one days of the motion by the moving party, extended for an additional three days in cases such as the present case due to service by mail.

WHEREAS the Defendant's Answer, ECF No. 37, admits all of the material facts in the Complaint, ECF No. 1, that are relevant to the Motion, and admits all of the material facts asserted in the Plaintiff's Local Rule 56(a)1 Statement, including, inter alia, that "[t]he obligations of Defendant to his children and the Plaintiff, as set forth in the Separation Agreement are domestic support obligations, as defined by 11 U.S.C. § 101(14A), and are nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5)," Local Rule 56(a)1 Statement, ¶ 12, Answer, ¶ 12; and

WHEREAS there being no genuine issue as to any material fact regarding nondischargeability under Bankruptcy Code § 523(a)(5), and the Plaintiff being entitled to judgment thereon as a matter of law, in accordance with which:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the obligations of the Defendant to his children and the Plaintiff, as set forth in the Separation Agreement, are domestic support obligations as defined by 11 U.S.C. § 101(14A) and are nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5).

A separate judgment enters simultaneously herewith.

Dated: August 27, 2010


Summaries of

In re D'Eliseo

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
Aug 30, 2010
CASE NO. 09-23455 (ASD), ADV. PRO. NO. 09-02066, RE: ECF NO. 46 (Bankr. D. Conn. Aug. 30, 2010)
Case details for

In re D'Eliseo

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: GINO D'ELISEO a/k/a GINO MICHAEL D'ELISEO, CHAPTER 7, DEBTORr…

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut

Date published: Aug 30, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 09-23455 (ASD), ADV. PRO. NO. 09-02066, RE: ECF NO. 46 (Bankr. D. Conn. Aug. 30, 2010)