From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Delaoz v. Delaoz [1st Dept 2000

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 6, 2000
(N.Y. App. Div. Jan. 6, 2000)

Opinion

January 6, 2000

Order, Family Court, New York County (Susan Larabee, J.), entered on or about September 11, 1997, which, in a support proceeding under Family Court Act article 4, denied respondent's objections to a hearing examiner's order denying his motion to vacate an order made upon his failure to appear at a hearing, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Theodore S. Green, for petitioner-respondent.

John A. Pappalardo, for respondent-appellant.

ROSENBERGER, J.P., WILLIAMS, LERNER, SAXE, BUCKLEY, JJ.


The record, which shows that the hearing was adjourned to July 9, 1997 rather than July 10, 1997 in accordance with respondent's expressed preference, amply justifies Family Court's rejection of respondent's claim that he failed to appear on July 9 because he mistakenly believed the hearing had been scheduled for July 10 on the ground that he was not credible. We would also note respondent's well-established penchant for missing court dates (see, Haas v. Haas, 84 A.D.2d 702), as well as his failure to submit an affidavit of merit.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Delaoz v. Delaoz [1st Dept 2000

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 6, 2000
(N.Y. App. Div. Jan. 6, 2000)
Case details for

In re Delaoz v. Delaoz [1st Dept 2000

Case Details

Full title:In re Proceeding for Support, etc., ERCILIA DELAOZ, Petitioner-Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 6, 2000

Citations

(N.Y. App. Div. Jan. 6, 2000)