From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Declemente

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 22, 2010
201 N.J. 4 (N.J. 2010)

Opinion

January 22, 2010.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 08-413, concluding that THOMAS A. DECLEMENTE of SECAUCUS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 1.7(a) (conflict of interest), RPC 1.8(a) (business transaction with clients), RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS A. DECLEMENTE is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the further Order of the Court, effective February 18, 2010; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20-20(c), respondent's failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of Rule 1:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent's petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(c); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10-2; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Declemente

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 22, 2010
201 N.J. 4 (N.J. 2010)
Case details for

In re Declemente

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS A. DECLEMENTE, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jan 22, 2010

Citations

201 N.J. 4 (N.J. 2010)
986 A.2d 677

Citing Cases

In re Yohan Choi

in a bankruptcy matter, a violation of RPC 3.4(c) and RPC 8.4(d); he also exhibited a lack of diligence and…

In re Tider

Suspensions were imposed where attorneys either had significant ethics histories or were guilty of violating…