From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re DeBrango-Berenguer

DISCIPLINARY REVIEW BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
Jul 23, 2018
Docket No. DRB 18-169 (N.J. Jul. 23, 2018)

Opinion

Docket No. DRB 18-169

07-23-2018

Re: In the Matter of Linda M. DeBrango-Berenguer

ELLEN A. BRODSKY CHIEF COUNSEL PAULA T. GRANUZZO DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL MELISSA URBAN FIRST ASSISTANT COUNSEL TIMOTHY M. ELLIS LILLIAN LEWIN BARRY R. PETERSEN, JR. COLIN T. TAMS KATHRYN ANNE WINTERLE ASSISTANT COUNSEL


BONNIE C. FROST, ESQ., CHAIR
BRUCE W. CLARK, ESQ., VICE-CHAIR
PETER J. BOYER, ESQ.
HON. MAURICE J. GALLIPOLI
THOMAS J. HOBERMAN
REGINA WAYNES JOSEPH, ESQ.
EILEEN RIVERA
ANNE C. SINGER, ESQ.
ROBERT C. ZMIRICH ELLEN A. BRODSKY
CHIEF COUNSEL PAULA T. GRANUZZO
DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL MELISSA URBAN
FIRST ASSISTANT COUNSEL TIMOTHY M. ELLIS
LILLIAN LEWIN
BARRY R. PETERSEN, JR.
COLIN T. TAMS
KATHRYN ANNE WINTERLE
ASSISTANT COUNSEL RICHARD J. HUGHES JUSTICE COMPLEX Mark Neary, Clerk
Supreme Court of New Jersey
P.O. Box 970
Trenton, New Jersey 08625 District Docket No. VIII-2014-0032E Dear Mr. Neary:

The Disciplinary Review Board reviewed the motion for discipline by consent (reprimand or such lesser discipline as the Board may determine) filed by the District VIII Ethics Committee (DEC), pursuant to R. 1:20-10(b). Following a review of the record, the Board determined to grant the motion. In the Board's view, a reprimand is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent's violation of RPC 1.1(a).

Specifically, respondent represented grievant, Zoltan J. Zeisky, in a bankruptcy matter. During the course of that representation, respondent failed to communicate with the bankruptcy trustee on behalf of her client, failed to appear at a hearing on a motion to dismiss (presumably, to dismiss the Chapter 13 petition), and subsequently failed to request a conversion to a Chapter 7 plan. Respondent also failed to take advantage of the financial assistance that his client's daughter offered, both prior to, and after, the sheriff's sale on his home. In so doing, respondent violated RPC 1.1(a). Respondent's misconduct resulted in significant harm to her client by the foreclosure on his home.

Conduct involving gross neglect, commonly found alongside lack of diligence and failure to communicate with the client, has resulted in a reprimand if harm to the client has occurred. See, e.g., In re Bogard, 220 N.J. 44 (2014) (reprimand for gross neglect, lack of diligence, and failure to communicate with a client; the attorney's misconduct in a single client matter resulted in the loss of the client's home at a sheriff's sale; no prior discipline); and In re Uffelman, 200 N.J. 260 (2009) (reprimand for attorney guilty of gross neglect, lack of diligence, and failure to communicate with a client; although the attorney had no disciplinary record, the reprimand was premised on the extensive harm caused to the client, who was forced to shut down his business for three months because of the attorney's failure to represent the client's interests diligently and responsibly).

In mitigation, the Board considered that respondent entered into a stipulation and admitted the facts, evidencing a willingness to take responsibility for her misconduct. Further, she has no history of final discipline.

Nonetheless, the Board determined that the proffered mitigation did not outweigh the aggravating factor of significant harm to the client — foreclosure. Therefore, on balance, the Board determined that respondent's misconduct merits a reprimand.

Enclosed are the following documents:

1. Notice of motion for discipline by consent, dated March 19, 2018.

2. Stipulation of discipline by consent, dated April 16, 2018.

3. Affidavit of consent, dated April 12, 2018.

4. Ethics history, dated July 23, 2018.

Very truly yours,

/s/

Ellen A. Brodsky

Chief Counsel EAB/trj
Ends.
c: See attached list c: (w/o enclosures)

Bonnie C. Frost, Chair

Disciplinary Review Board (e-mail)

Joseph R. Zapata, Jr., Presenter

District VIII Ethics Committee (e-mail)

Howard Duff, Chair

District VIII Ethics Committee (e-mail)

Barry J. Muller, Secretary

District VIII Ethics Committee (e-mail and regular mail)

Phillip Nettl, Vice-Chair

District VIII Ethics Committee (e-mail)

Isabel K. McGinty, Statewide Ethics Coordinator

Office of Attorney Ethics (e-mail)

Robert E. Ramsey, Esq., Respondent's Counsel (e-mail and

regular mail)

Zoltan J. Zeisky, Grievant (regular mail)


Summaries of

In re DeBrango-Berenguer

DISCIPLINARY REVIEW BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
Jul 23, 2018
Docket No. DRB 18-169 (N.J. Jul. 23, 2018)
Case details for

In re DeBrango-Berenguer

Case Details

Full title:Re: In the Matter of Linda M. DeBrango-Berenguer

Court:DISCIPLINARY REVIEW BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Jul 23, 2018

Citations

Docket No. DRB 18-169 (N.J. Jul. 23, 2018)