From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re D.C.

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
May 20, 2014
NO. 14-14-00223-CV (Tex. App. May. 20, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 14-14-00223-CV

05-20-2014

IN THE INTEREST OF D.C., A MINOR CHILD


On Appeal from the 257th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-05172J


ORDER

On May 5, 2014, Brian J. Fischer filed a notice of appearance as attorney for the minor child, which was erroneously considered as an appearance for appellant. On May 6, 2014, Tom Zakes filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for appellant, which was granted in error. The motion does not comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5. When new counsel is not substituted, the motion must provide the party's name and last known address, state that a copy of the motion was delivered to the party, state that the party was notified in writing of the right to object to the motion, and show that the motion was delivered to the party by certified and regular mail. See Tex. R. App. P. 6.5.

Accordingly, we WITHDRAW the ruling granting counsel's motion to withdraw, which was issued in error. Counsel's motion to withdraw from representing appellant is DENIED. Tom Zakes remains counsel of record for appellant.

The reporter's record in this appeal was due May 19, 2014. Appellant is ordered to take the necessary steps to see that the reporter's record is filed on or before June 6, 2014, which includes making payment arrangements for the record, unless the trial court determines that appellant is indigent.

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

In re D.C.

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
May 20, 2014
NO. 14-14-00223-CV (Tex. App. May. 20, 2014)
Case details for

In re D.C.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF D.C., A MINOR CHILD

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: May 20, 2014

Citations

NO. 14-14-00223-CV (Tex. App. May. 20, 2014)