From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re D.C.

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Apr 3, 2014
NO. 14-14-00223-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 3, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 14-14-00223-CV

04-03-2014

IN THE INTEREST OF D.C., a Minor Child


On Appeal from the 257th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-05172J


ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment signed February 14, 2014, in a suit in which the termination of the parent-child relationship is at issue. The notice of appeal was due March 6, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b); 28.4(a). The notice of appeal was filed March 17, 2014, a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is "necessarily implied" when the perfecting instrument is filed within fifteen days of its due date. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.).

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal on or before April 14, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; 10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

In re D.C.

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Apr 3, 2014
NO. 14-14-00223-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 3, 2014)
Case details for

In re D.C.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF D.C., a Minor Child

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 3, 2014

Citations

NO. 14-14-00223-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 3, 2014)